MAP
Active   Manufactured   Home   Owners   Association
The Voice for Manufactured Home Owners in British Columbia since 1971

xml link
Subscribe via RSS (xml) for latest news

Get Acrobat Reader

LAND RENTED FOR HOUSING

Active Manufactured Home Owners Association has prepared a Discussion Paper on Land Rented for Housing intended for use in meetings with the Provincial Government. The Paper outlines the need for a more comprehensive Act than the Manufactured Home Park Tenancy Act, the benefits of change as well as some interim measures to protect this vulnerable segment of affordable housing and those owning it.

This Paper has been circulated to both the Liberal and New Democratic Parties and is being made available to the general public through this website. For your information, this is the message that accompanied the package sent to the politicians:

The loss of affordable housing in manufactured home parks is a common problem across Canada. BC has always been a province that looks to the future providing modern legislation that can be a model for other provinces. Unfortunately, our Manufactured Home Park Tenancy Act does not fall into this category. To assist in remedying this flaw, our Association has put together the attached Discussion Paper on Land Rented for Housing. Those who rent land for housing have a civic responsibility to deal fairly with those persons they have encouraged to become co-investing partners in this type of affordable housing business. Since this social conscience appears to be missing, it is the responsibility of government to provide legislation to protect the vulnerable. The type and value of homes in modern parks as well as the financial, emotional and medical issues faced by all manufactured home owners losing or threatened with the loss of their homes makes it imperative to undertake this legislation immediately.

The attached Discussion Paper is intended to facilitate a dialogue between government and manufactured home owner Associations that will lead to a modern Act dealing with Land Rented for Housing but also proposes some interim measures. In order to keep the Paper to a reasonable length, we have only touched the surface of issues. More research and discussions with us will bring to light additional information. We suggest a series of meetings to discuss the various aspects of the problems and arrive at solutions.

Any legislation being proposed should be given to home owner Associations dedicated to improving conditions in British Columbia's home parks before finalization and introduction into the legislature. We realize it is a Ministerial Prerogative to make a surprise presentation of legislation in the legislature but in cases like this one, it could lead to problems not foreseen by those not living and experiencing life on Land Rented for Housing.


The attached Discussion Paper on Land Rented for Housing is also endorsed by:
  • Surrey and District Manufactured Home Owners Association
  • Penticton and District Manufactured Home Owners Association

For your information, we will be posting responses and progress on our website from time to time, as we get a lot of requests information from across BC and Canada on this issue. We look forward to hearing from you regarding what your intentions are to deal with this Discussion Paper.

Download a PDF copy of the whole Discussion Paper HERE

This a large pdf file of 100 pages and 3 megs in size, but well worth the read.
We welcome comments from readers of this site regarding this discussion paper.

CONSULTANTS REPORT ON MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS - 2007   HERE


Back to top


BC Liberal Response   HERE
BC NDP Response   HERE
BC Conservative Response   HERE
RICH COLEMAN REPLIES

Download a PDF copy of Rich Colman's response HERE

At first read, we find this reply sadly insufficient. We are currently preparing a reply and will post it here, after it has been completed.

In the meantime, we welcome comments from readers of this site regarding the Provincial Government Ministry brief letter in response to our long detailed Discussion Paper.


TENANCY BRANCH REPLIES

If you read Rich Coleman's response, you will have noted that he refered our question about SAFER inequities to Suzanne Bell, Executive Director of the Residential Tenancy Branch. We did just that with supporting example documentation.
Today, August 1st, 2009, we received the Tenancy Branch's response from Judith Dyrland, A/Executive Director. Upon receiving this reply, we again, have found their lack of understanding, and their avoidance in discussing this issue, quite distressing. We invite you to download the documentation and decide for yourselves. As usual comments are welcome.


2009 SAFER Letter to Tenancy Branch   HERE
Actual Case Examples which accompanied letter   HERE and   HERE
Tenancy Branch Reply   HERE

Back to top

AMHOA, Box 1000, SAANICHTON, BC.   V8M 2C5   Telephone (250) 544-1456   Email: AMHOA   ©AMHOA 2007/2008
The material on this web site does not constitute legal or professional advice and is presented as information only. We recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it, is appropriate to your particular situation.